North Carolina was argued before the Supreme Court on October 6, 2014. October sitting Traffic stops and police accountability: Heien v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 5.2 Arizona gerrymandering: Arizona State Legislature v.4.2 Housing and discrimination: Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v.4.1 Government control over signs: Reed v.3.2 Pregnancy discrimination: Young v.2.3 Redistricting: Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al.2.1 Separation of powers: Zivotofsky v. 1.3 Overtime pay: Integrity Staffing Solutions v.1.2 Religious practices in prison: Holt v.1.1 Traffic stops and police accountability: Heien v.Click here for information about all of the cases heard by the Supreme Court in the 2015-2016 term and here for all cases from the 2016-2017 term. To read about major cases heard in other terms, click on the following links: 2012, 2013, and 2015. For further exploration of or information about the major cases heard by the Supreme Court in 2014, please visit the rulings included under the cases below. Wall Street Journal, "Supreme Court Adds Discrimination Cases to Its Docket," October 2, 2014īallotpedia's goal was to provide readers with an easy understanding of the important aspects of these rulings.ThinkProgress, "What To Expect When The Supreme Court Returns To Work Next Week," September 24, 2014.Reuters, "Gay marriage aside, business cases dominate U.S.New York Times, "Justices Take Cases on Bias, Redistricting and Judicial Elections," October 2, 2014.Supreme Court’s October 2014 Term," September 18, 2014 Heritage Foundation, "Overview of the U.S.Below is a short sampling of articles used: Our starting point for choosing which cases to watch this year came from articles published by major news organizations at the start of the term. The Supreme Court heard cases that addressed same-sex marriage, redistricting, the Affordable Care Act also known as "Obamacare" and hiring discrimination, as well as many other issues.īallotpedia understands that this list is subjective and that individuals may have prioritized other rulings. The United States Supreme Court addressed a variety of issues during its October 2014 term, one which was described by Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for the New York Times, as containing "blockbusters that could really transform American life." In a similar statement, the Georgetown University Law Center's Supreme Court Institute referred to the 2014 term as one that "could be among the most momentous in recent history."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |